Home Exploring the Potential: Green Hydrogen and the Shipping Industry – Can Green Hydrogen Float the Future of Shipping?

Executive Summary

The global shipping industry, responsible for transporting 80% of the world’s traded goods annually, is crucial for international commerce but comes at a significant environmental cost. The maritime sector contributes up to 3% of global CO2 emissions, totaling 1.61 gigatons (Gt) of CO2e annually. These emissions, primarily from heavy fuel oil (HFO), contribute to climate change and poor air quality around ports.

With increasing regulatory pressure from the International Maritime Organization (IMO), which aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030 and achieve zero-emission shipping by 2050, the industry must adapt or face severe penalties. Market forces also demand sustainability, as investors and consumers prioritize environmentally friendly practices.

Current efficiency measures, like slow steaming, and alternative fuels such as Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) offer limited emissions reductions. The industry needs a more transformative solution for a sustainable future, beyond these incremental improvements.

 

The Looming Storm: Why Decarbonization is Non-Negotiable

The maritime shipping industry faces a perfect storm of regulatory pressure, market demands, and the limitations of current efficiency measures.

On the regulatory front, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has set increasingly stringent targets to curb emissions from ships. The IMO’s 2030 strategy aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% compared to 2008 levels, with a long-term ambition to achieve zero-emission shipping by 2050. Failure to comply with these regulations could result in hefty fines and potential operational restrictions for non-compliant vessels.

Well-to-wake GHG Emissions
Q

Beyond regulatory pressures, market forces are amplifying the need for decarbonization. Investors and consumers increasingly prioritize sustainability, and shipping companies that fail to commit to cleaner operations risk reputational damage and being overlooked by environmentally conscious investors and cargo owners.

Current efforts to improve fuel efficiency, such as slow steaming (reducing vessel speed), offer limited impact on overall emissions reductions. Moreover, alternative fuels like Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), while providing some environmental benefits, still contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. The current landscape demands a more transformative solution for a truly sustainable future.

 

Fueling Change: The Case Against Traditional Marine Fuel

Heavy fuel oil (HFO), the workhorse of the maritime industry for decades, is becoming an anchor dragging shipping companies down. Burning HFO releases greenhouse gases, including sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter, significantly contributing to air and water pollution.

Furthermore, the volatility of HFO prices and fossil fuels being the origin of this fuel, the reliance on HFO exposes shipping companies to long-term sustainability concerns. In a world increasingly focused on clean energy solutions, HFO simply doesn’t offer the future-proof approach needed for a thriving maritime industry.

 

Promising Low-carbon Options for Shipping Companies

As the maritime industry navigates the choppy waters of decarbonization, several low-carbon fuel options emerge as potential lifelines.

  • Green Hydrogen stands out for its zero-emission operation at the point of use. Its high energy density makes it suitable for long-distance voyages, overcoming the limitation of battery technology. However, challenges remain with hydrogen storage (cryogenic temperatures) and infrastructure development for production and bunkering (refueling).
  • Ammonia, another promising option, can achieve zero-emission operation when produced from renewable sources (green ammonia). It offers a higher energy density than hydrogen in liquid form and potentially better well-to-wheel efficiency.
  • Biofuels, derived from sustainable sources like vegetable oils or waste materials, offer a lower carbon footprint than HFO. However, concerns remain about scalability and potential competition with food production. Additionally, their well-to-wheel efficiency can be lower than other options.
  • Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) is a lower-carbon alternative to HFO, but it still emits greenhouse gases during production and combustion.
Comparison of different fuels
Q
Comparison of Maritime Fuels

Green Hydrogen – The Ticket to a Cleaner Future

Green hydrogen is a versatile fuel with several potential applications. It can be used in fuel cells, blended with conventional fuels, or even entirely replace conventional fuels in combustion engines. Among these options, fuel cells offer the greatest efficiency, up to 50-60%, and potentially even higher if heat recovery is employed. Adapted combustion engines, while less efficient than fuel cells, can still achieve efficiencies between 40-50%.

Blending hydrogen with conventional fuels can also improve combustion and reduce GHG emissions. Even a simple 50/50 mix of heavy fuel oil and hydrogen can significantly reduce CO2 emissions, by up to 43% per unit of distance traveled. Storing and transporting pure hydrogen on large ships pose significant challenges, leading to a preference for converting it into alternative carriers.

Hydrogen-derived fuels offer a promising path towards zero-emission or carbon-neutral shipping. Ammonia, for example, can be produced using hydrogen and is a potential future fuel for ships. Other options include electro-fuels like E-LNG (electrolytically produced liquefied natural gas), E-diesel, and E-methanol. All these options share a common thread: they rely on hydrogen as a key building block. This highlights the versatility of hydrogen and its significant role in decarbonizing the maritime sector, even if it’s not always the fuel directly powering the ships.

 

Charting the course: Targets

In the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) 2050 net-zero scenario, near-complete decarbonization in the shipping sector depends on shifting toward clean fuels.

Ammonia and methanol produced from green hydrogen (“green ammonia” and “green methanol”) hold advantages compared to traditional fuels. For example, green ammonia boasts a well-to-wheel greenhouse gas footprint up to 90% lower than conventional marine fuels, while green methanol offers similar emission reduction.

To reach the target of net zero by 2050, about 59.5 million tons of hydrogen will be annually required for direct use and clean fuel production. Similarly, the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) predicts a comparable scale of hydrogen feedstock, estimating around 60 million tonnes of green H2 annually as a feedstock for shipping fuels by mid-century.

By 2030, marine fuel demand is projected to reach 13EJ according to current policies. To meet the short-term target of a 30-40% reduction by 2030, the proportion of zero-carbon fuels need to rise to 10% (1.3EJ), equivalent to approximately 70 million tons of e-ammonia. This amount is 3.5 times the current global traded volume of ammonia or twice the traded volume of methanol.

According to DNV, the projected share of carbon-neutral fuels, those made using clean H2 and captured CO2, is expected to be less than 7% by 2030.[8] It estimates that these carbon-neutral fuels will have a demand of up to 17 million tons of oil equivalent. So, how much hydrogen as feedstock would we require to meet this demand?

 

Where are we with our resources?

  • Renewable Electricity

    According to the IEA estimative, an extra 600TWh of renewable energy would be required to power this hydrogen demand, necessitating 230GW of installed wind and solar capacity. However, as a sought-after commodity by other sectors, scaling up renewable energy must be much faster. With limited time to build the required infrastructure, this could lead to less supply than demand, and higher prices in the short term, resulting in reduced demand and alterations to the plans.
    Renewable energy deployment is not a bottleneck for the energy transition. This renewable capacity target is a feasible effort, considering that 2023 alone saw more than 500GW of solar PV and wind capacity deployed.
  • Electrolyzer Capacity

IEA estimates that 130GW of electrolyzer capacity would be required to produce enough hydrogen for ammonia to make up 10% of maritime fuels by 2030. However, this rises to 150GW for green methanol. This target is in line as there are 175GW of electrolyzer projects planned until 2030, although many of these will have to feed into the demand from other sectors as well.

  • Carbon-neutral Fuel Projects

DNV reports over 2,200 active and proposed projects for producing carbon-neutral fuels. However, it remains unclear how many of these projects rely on green hydrogen, biofuels, or carbon capture for clean hydrogen. These projects aim to supply the market with 45 million to 63 million tons of oil equivalent by 2030.

Notably, most of these projects are still in the planning phase and have not reached a final investment decision or started construction. Additionally, many of them are not specifically dedicated to supplying the maritime sector.

  • Modification of Container Vessels

Transitioning to clean fuels also necessitates modifications to existing container vessels. Ammonia and methanol, for instance, require adjustments to fuel storage tanks, piping systems, and potentially even engines, to ensure compatibility and safety.

According to Oxford University’s new study, around $2.25 trillion of investment in infrastructure development will be required if 90% of the global shipping fleet were to use green ammonia as its only fuel in 2050.

TCO of a Container vessel
Q

As shown in the chart above, balancing affordability with environmental benefits is crucial. Efforts to bring down the total cost of ownership (TCO) for vessels using clean fuels are essential. This can involve streamlining production processes, developing efficient bunkering infrastructure, and exploring alternative financing options.

 

Conclusion

As we navigate through the complexities of maritime decarbonization, our perspective remains steadfast: the future of shipping hinges on innovative, sustainable solutions that address regulatory pressures, market demands, and environmental imperatives.

From our expert viewpoint, integrating green hydrogen into the maritime sector is not merely an option but a necessity for achieving the International Maritime Organization’s ambitious emission reduction targets. The FutureBridge expertise opines that while challenges such as hydrogen storage, infrastructure development, and vessel modification are significant, they are surmountable with concerted effort and investment.

FutureBridge foresight emphasizes that achieving near-complete decarbonization by 2050 will require a robust commitment to innovation and collaboration across the industry. The path forward involves technological advancements and the alignment of regulatory frameworks, market incentives, and financial investments to create a conducive environment for sustainable maritime practices. By embracing these actions and fostering a spirit of collaboration, the maritime industry can harness the transformative power of clean fuels for a sustainable future. The journey is long, but with unwavering commitment, a cleaner horizon awaits.

 

To explore broader avenues on the role of green hydrogen in shipping’s future and actionable strategies for a sustainable energy transition, consult our expert analysts.

Need a thought partner?

Share your focus area or question to engage with our Analysts through the Business Objectives service.

Submit My Business Objective

Our Clients

Our long-standing clients include some of the worlds leading brands and forward-thinking corporations.